Wednesday, 08 March 2006

  • A mixture, after all?

    I was talking to my counselor today and he was commenting on how we assume that romantic love is essentially eros love.  When I think about unconditional love (agape) -- caring for people, "working" towards love, that's definitely different than what I think about doing on a date.  My counselor was saying that there's three components to romantic love... sort of a triangle: 1. eros, 2. agape, 3. philia.  Whenever one component dominates, romantic love is skewed.  I'm just starting to think through this stuff...

    On a different note, Haiti has the worst (160th out of 160) water in the whole world?!  Just another reason to help build 4 wells there through: www.xanga.com/project440

Comments (3)

  • emu
    B and I read through this book on marriage and actually they depict love also as a triangle. Commitment is the base of the triangle, and two sides are passion and intimacy. If it is not an equilateral triangle, then something is askew...
  • Jscribbler911

    what is the philia part? <33 ps. I can't get to the preferences on the PC for AIM.

    Miss you...gotta edit that hero paper on you (which didnt win 1, 2, or 3 :' (  ) lol, so I can turn it in for an Honors English Application. Even though I think I'm doing atyp? That's the update on my life...

    <333333333333 fo eva b-train! Send Carin my salutations and two oranges too, lol.

  • ps103
    Thanks, Emu, I like that a lot! Intimacy and passion definitely should balance!

    Beloved sister, Philia to me meant "sibling-love" (e.g. brotherly love, sisterly love), though wikipedia says it's "friendship." Miss you, too!!
  • Choose Identity

  • Give eProps (?)

  • New! You can now edit your comments for 15 minutes after submitting.

About this Entry

Who recommended?

Who gave the eProps?

2 eProps from: